Friday, May 20, 2016

Your 'Gender Issues' Proposal Section is BS and it Doesn't Even Matter


Imagine this scenario:

You, a cis/het/white/male scientist, are writing a grant proposal. You have an awesome CV, everyone loves you, and you have crafted a ground-breaking, paradigm-shifting research plan. But this one section on "gender issues" is confounding you... the guidelines for this part read like a glossy business report and just say things like "gender is important" and "gender should be balanced". Actually, you probably didn't bother looking up the guidelines, so you really want to know: what do you write here? How could this hurt your effort to win money to do science?

Obviously you don't know what any of the issues are. You've rightly been focusing your efforts on producing amazing science instead of "diversity" or "social justice" or "womany" things - but you've paid enough attention to notice all the extra opportunities for women (and sometimes minorities) that exist, so you know that your female students will have no problems finding a job just because of their gender. (You have confidently told them as much.) So what do you write about "gender issues" in relation to your awesome Nobel-worthy science proposal?

Well, you're in luck. It turns out, your reviewers are probably also cis/het/white/males, and they don't know what the issues are either! Your bullshit paragraph saying how "You will totally collaborate with women, thereby providing female role models to your students! You have a couple of women in your department already! You will try to recruit more women, because women are important and gender should be balanced!" - this bullshit paragraph is absolutely good enough for you to win money to do science. Hooray!





Still here?

Well, if this scenario rings a bit true for you (even if you're not, however statistically improbably, a cis/het/white/male scientist), but you nonetheless would like to improve your "gender issues" section so it's not complete BS, even though it totally doesn't matter, I've assembled an inexhaustive list of "Do's and Don'ts" compiled partly from my own experience.
  • DON'T joke that you're including me because it will look good in your "gender issues" section. Also, don't believe it. Even though it's probably true. It's just not a funny joke.
  • DO take down all the pictures of old white men in the conference rooms and replace them with pictures of science. You know, the thing we are all here to do.
  • DON'T be proud of that one year you had more than one female PhD student. You did not earn that. The female PhD students earned that, despite all the apparent barriers you're still not sure really exist. Be proud of them, not yourself.
  • DO write a better "gender issues" section by maybe perhaps possibly doing some research? You know the kind of thing you did to figure out the background knowledge, specific parameter values, targets, etc. for the science section? Reading papers, absorbing information, putting it all together? You can do that here, too. If you want. Whatever though. It doesn't matter.
  • DON'T ask me for advice about your proposal and wonder what "he" will think when "he" reads this section, even though you haven't time-traveled to the future and determined that your reviewers prefer masculine pronouns. Your patriarchy fails to impress me, as does your lack of a time machine, and I won't feel like giving you advice anymore. I'm petty like that.
  • DO broaden your conceptions of equity. I don't care if your country is as white as the new-fallen snow, by paying lip service to gender issues and completely ignoring all the other dimensions of discrimination, marginalization, and bias that people face, you are part of the problem. Just think of all the other things you could be paying lip service to in order to pretend like you're actually doing something good! Race! Class! Ability! Gender identity and gender expression! Sexual orientation! You could give yourself so many cookies for even knowing that these concepts exist! It's okay if you don't, though. It doesn't really matter.
  • DON'T suggest, when your female astrophysics student is struggling, that if it has been her dream to be a Veterinarian, for example, she should totally follow her dreams. Don't invite your male student to watch football at your house without also inviting your female student. Also, don't pee in the women's bathroom. I can't believe I even have to tell you this, but seriously, DON'T.


[A final DON'T for readers: don't go sharing this with people who could be my past, current, or future bosses - I like being hilariously critical of academia, but they just wouldn't get it. In fact, they are probably featured in my real world examples and are therefore the "butt" of my jokes. Except for future bosses, due to aforementioned lack of a time machine.]

Saturday, May 14, 2016

The Freedom Tart

I made up a dessert today.

Basically, I made some delicious double chocolate chip cookies that were going stale. A microwave could rejuvenate them, but I don't have one. But I did have some leftover cream.

Eventually, my friends and I decided on a perfect name for this new dessert creation. But it is perfect only if you have a certain sense of humor. Don't get me wrong, the dessert is perfect either way, but the name may be an acquired taste.

May I present to you,

Freedom Tart


Built on the broken backs of stale dark chocolate cookies, with whipped cream, strawberries, and blueberries on top, it is the perfect metaphor for America.

You start with dark chocolate chip cookies that will be the foundation of your dessert. (Nestle's "double chocolate dream" cookies work here if you can find their recipe on the back of the bag). But, after a few days, they are looking a little worse for wear. The dessert really doesn't work without them, but you can cut some strawberries and add them to freshly whipped cream (whip 1 pint of heavy cream with 2 Tbsp sugar until stiff peaks form) and spread this over the broken chocolate cookies. (Once the cookies let you down, you must break them.) Top with blueberries for an extra dose of patriotism. You should not be able to even see the chocolate cookies, which again are the foundation of this dessert. It makes it easier if you don't see them - you can then pretend that they and their concerns don't matter.

"Mommy, why are the cookies broken?"
"Well honey, if they weren't broken, how would the rest of the tart stand up? Plus they are just naturally broken like that."

If you want to be technical, this is an unbaked tart; instead of a pie crust, the crust is provided by the broken cookie bits - without their consent of course - and the whipped cream, strawberries, and blueberries are the filling.

In much the same way as America was built on the exploitation of black slave labor, allowing it to become an economic power in the early stages after its creation, the Freedom Tart relies on the existence of an easily exploitable source of stale delicious chocolate cookies. Strawberries and whipped cream are mere fluff without this solid chocolate base.

I hope that you can enjoy this recipe. Joking aside, if you find yourself in the position of having too many double chocolate chip cookies, the Freedom Tart is an easy way to whiten - er, lighten up the stale dessert into a fresh new American treat.

[A picture could not be provided because we ate it too fast. It was damn good and tasted like Freedom.]